Jari Leino

mielenkiintoinen kirjoitus...koitapa Leino saada tämä juttu näkymään muuallakin...

Monty Python -komediaryhmään kuulunut brittikoomikko John Cleese on herättänyt laajaa äbäläwäbälää toteamalla, että "Lontoo ei ole enää englantilainen kaupunki".

Lontoon pormestari Boris Johnson vastasi tähän toteamalla, että Lontoon monikulttuurisuutta tulee “juhlia”. Labour-puolueen Ken Livingstone lisäsi: “Säilyttääkseen kilpailukykynsä Lontoon on oltava globaali liike-elämän, kulttuurin ja innovaation keskus, mikä voidaan saavuttaa vain jos täällä työskentelee ja asuu kaikkien kansojen ihmisiä.”

Ja näistä herroista John Cleese on siis se, jota virallisesti pidetään koomikkona.

Alkuperäinen kirjoittaja Jari Leino

Historioitsija David Starkey on aiheuttanut runsaasti suvaitsevaista älämölöä sanomalla BBC:n televisiolähetyksessä, että yksi mellakoihin liittyvistä ongelmista on se, että monista syrjäytyneistä alaluokan valkoisista on tullut "mustia".

"Valkoisista on tullut mustia. Muotiin on tullut tietynlainen väkivaltainen, tuhoisa ja välinpitämätön gangstakulttuuri, jonka piirissä mustat ja valkoiset pojat ja tytöt toimivat yhdessä."

Britannian "julkisen sanan neuvosto" Ofcom sai yhteensä 103 valitusta, joissa Starkeyn lausuntoa pidettiin rotusyrjintänä tai rodullisena loukkauksena. Ofcom totesi, että keskustelu oli ollut asiallinen eikä ryhtynyt jatkotoimenpiteisiin.

Starkey kiistää sanoneensa mitään rasssistista ja seisoo sanojensa takana.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/t...t-remarks.html

Daily Mail:

The majority of violent inner-city crime is committed by black men, police figures suggest.

But the statistics also show that black men are twice as likely to be victims of such crimes.

Police hold black men responsible for more than two-thirds of shootings and more than half of robberies and street crimes in London, according to figures released by Scotland Yard.

The data, which provides the ethnicity of the 18,091 men and boys who police took action against in London during 2009-10, looked at both violent and sexual offences.

It found that 67 per cent of those caught by police for gun crimes were black.

Among those proceeded against for street crimes, including muggings, assault with intent to rob and snatching property, 54 per cent were black males.

On sex offences, black men made up 32 per cent of all male suspects, with 49 per cent of those apprehended by police being white men.

The statistics also suggest that police hold black women accountable for a disproportionate amount of violent crime. On knife crime, 45 per cent of suspected female perpetrators were black.

Just over 12 per cent of London's 7.5million population is black, including those of mixed black and white parentage, while 69 per cent is white, according to the Office for National Statistics.

Rassismin vika, sanovat tutkijat ja asiantuntijat. Se on rassismin vika, että mustat tappavat toisiaan.

Powellin ennustusten paikkansapitävyydestä (lähde: Christopher Caldwell: Reflections on the Revolution in Europe).

Puheessaan Lontoon rotariklubilla puoli vuotta Rivers of Blood -puheen jälkeen Powell shokeerasi yleisöään väittämällä, että Britannian etninen väestö (siihen aikaan noin miljoona) kasvaisi 4,5 miljoonaan vuoteen 2002 mennessä. Väestötilastojen mukaan Britannian etninen väestö vuonna 2002 oli 4.635.296.

Vuonna 1970 vaalikampanjapuheessaan Powell ennusti, että 20-25% Wolverhamptonin, Birminghamin ja Lontoon väestöstä tulisi olemaan maahanmuuttajia ja näiden jälkeläisiä. Vuoden 2001 väestötilastojen mukaan toteutuneet luvut olivat Wolverhampton 22,2%n, Birmingham 29,6% ja Lontoo 34,4%.

Ei olekaan ihme, että suvaitsijat ovat keskittyneet keskustelemaan siitä, oliko Powell moraalisesti oikeassa, koska on aivan kiistämätöntä, että hän oli faktisesti oikeassa.

Telegraph: The 2011 English summer riots revisited

A year after the riots in England, our political class has shamefully shied away from tackling the problems of race and a destructive black street culture

''Humankind cannot bear very much reality.” T S Eliot’s dictum might have been written for the riots of last summer, whose first anniversary falls this week.

Remember them? Remember those extraordinary scenes which, played out night after night on the news bulletins, transfixed the nation and the world? Of the police overwhelmed and fleeing from the rioters? Of mobs ransacking familiar high streets the length and breadth of England and even carrying the mayhem into the holy of holies of consumerism, Oxford Circus itself? Of buildings and whole blocks deliberately set on fire and burning furiously and unchecked, in scenes not seen in London since the worst days of the Blitz?

Remember them? At the time it seemed impossible that we should forget. Parliament was recalled. The Prime Minister proclaimed the “moral collapse” of society. And Iain Duncan Smith declared the riots would be as important a turning point for the Cameron Government as 9/11 had been for Tony Blair.

Remember? Well if you do, our leaders apparently don’t. The last time anybody mentioned the disturbances was back in March, when the official inquiry into the riots submitted its final report. Known with hip inclusiveness as the Riots Communities and Victims Panel, it called for better parenting and character-building education in schools. Its recommendations were received with due solemnity by government and opposition and promptly filed in a box labelled “Too difficult: don’t touch with a barge-pole”.

Since then, silence. A blessed amnesia has swept over our political class, and now it’s almost a case of “Riots? What riots?”.

There is a perfectly innocent explanation, of course, if hardly an edifying one. We live in an age of multiple crises, with new problems cropping up at every turn. We are also enduring a regime of omnishambles, with a weak Government drifting at the mercy of events. In such circumstances, things, even big ones, do just get forgotten.

But I fear there is more to it than that. For something rather odd started to happen, even as events were unrolling: we were told, with increasing firmness, not to believe our own senses.

It was obvious from the beginning, to anybody with eyes to see, that these were riots in which the race of many of the participants played an important part. Black commentators were especially clear about this. “These riots were about race. Why ignore the fact?” declared Katharine Birbalsingh in her blog for The Daily Telegraph. Darcus Howe, the veteran black activist, was even more emphatic. “It’s an insurrection,” he told The Huffington Post, “of a generation of poor, primarily black people from the Caribbean and from Africa.”

What could be clearer? Too clear, perhaps, for the political class and the mainstream media who, led by the Prime Minister, began an extraordinary exercise of what, with reference to George Orwell’s Newspeak, we might call New Sight. Firmly donning his magic spectacles, which rendered him unshakeably colour blind, David Cameron proclaimed the new truth: “It wasn’t race riots”.

He was echoed from the other end of the political spectrum by Max Wind-Cowie of the Leftish think-tank Demos, who asserted even more confidently: “This is not about race at all.” And so the chorus swelled.
(...)

... The Riots Communities and Victims Panel subjected the 3,000-odd people brought before the courts to every sort of analysis: by age, previous criminal record, educational achievement, employment, family structure and so on. There was one glaring omission: there was no tabulation of ethnicity. Nevertheless, and having rehearsed no evidence whatever, their report still repeated the official mantra: “We do not believe that these were race riots.”

Indeed, the only official document to present the proper, unvarnished picture is “The Statistical Bulletin of the Ministry of Justice on the Public Disorder of 6th-9th August 2011”. And it is incontrovertible: 41 per cent of those charged were white, 50 per cent black or mixed race, 7 per cent Asian and 2 per cent Chinese or other. These figures must of course be read against the proportion of the various groups in the population as a whole: in London, to which some two thirds of the cases relate, some 12 per cent of the population is black and 69 per cent is white. Whites, in other words, were significantly under-represented among the rioters; while blacks were four times over-represented.

Nor are the figures for the riots a fluke, as the Metropolitan Police statistics for 2009-10 show even more extreme disparities: 54 per cent of those proceeded against for street crimes were black; for robbery, 59 per cent; and for gun crimes, 67 per cent. This is also where the figures for previous criminality of the rioters come in: 76 per cent of the rioters brought before the courts were previous offenders; those convicted had committed a grand total of 16,000 offences between them and over a third had served time in jail.

The conclusion is inescapable and painful. Far from being merely opportunistic, the core of the rioters was formed of an already existing criminal class and that class is disproportionately black. This is the reality. But in our present society it is unbearable (in Eliot’s formulation). And unsayable.

No wonder the Government and the media worked so hard to suppress it. And no wonder outraged media and public opinion came down like a ton of bricks on those naive or foolhardy enough to tell the truth, like Big Jim on Sky, or me in that now notorious Newsnight debate, when “racist” was among the least of the insults thrown at me.
(...)

Extraordinary moment chef at Michelin-starred restaurant tries in vain to defend diners from mob of rampaging rioters with a ROLLING PIN

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz23B9ABJ9n

Michelin-tähdellä palkitun ravintolan kokki yrittää puolustautua rähinöitsijöitä vastaan kaulimella.

Mielenkiintoinen yksityiskohta jutusta:

It has also emerged that one rioter, Nasir Muhsen, 18, was living in a £3million apartment, funded by British taxpayers.

He and his family were housed in one of London’s most fashionable areas after they fled Iraq to claim asylum in Britain but he claimed to be so poor that he joined the riots to steal money for food.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz23B94hED6

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4969

Equally clear, though not as widely noted, was that the same failure of action corresponded to a transformation in the composition of the rioters from overwhelmingly poor black to full-scale diverse. People of every type realized that they could do whatever they wanted to, since the police were not going to stop them. What developed was a multicultural extravaganza that really was out of hand.

Fobba ja persut ovat vastenmielisiä sionisteja molemmat.

Tänään, joulupäivänä 25.12.2012 kello 19:05 Eino P. Keravalta piti kuuluisan You will not perish -puheensa Hommaforumilla.

However, there will be a war. A massive, long lasting war in Europe. It's a war between European values, European culture and European people against this "Gansterland". Days to come are tough. They are hard. There will be blood everywhere. But we will never give up or perish. Because we are many and because we represent humanity, democracy and human rights. The evil will perish. But it takes time. The times of near future are crucial. But the war has already begun. We must be ready to fight for humanity against the Beast. And we are. You will not perish.

Historia tulee näyttämään, oliko Eino P. Keravalta yhtä oikeassa kuin Enoch Powell.

Nyt siis tiedän, että "P." Einochin nimimerkissä tarkoittaa "Powellia"

Linkki yllämainittuun raporttiin: http://www.justice.gov.uk/statistics...rder-august-11

Alkuperäinen kirjoittaja Seppo Saarela

Nyt siis tiedän, että "P." Einochin nimimerkissä tarkoittaa "Powellia"

It is told that after his famous "You will not perish" speech, Einoch P. from Kerava received a steady flow of over one thousand knickers per week from Swedish blondes of various ages.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Britains-Gre.../dp/1780353103

In the long history of Britain as an independent nation all of the immigrant groups who ever reached our shores never amounted to more than one per cent of the population...before 1997. After 1997 more than five million immigrants were allowed to come and live in Britain unhindered and they now make up 10% of the total population of Britain. Between now and 2020 these new immigrant settlers will increase in number by nearly half a million a year up until at least 2020. There was no vote ever taken, it was not in any political manifesto and it was never discussed in Parliament but the consequences of this invasion has changed the face of Britain forever. The exact financial cost to the taxpayer remains a secret but the imminent dismantling of the welfare state and the NHS shows that we are already paying the bill. Still to come are years of civil unrest, strikes and increased terrorist activity, restrictions placed on our liberties and drastic reductions in our living standards. This book examines the legacy New Labour left Britain and the prospects of our survival over the next decade.

60-luvun vallankumouksellinen Peter Hitchens myöntää, että

Kun olin vallankumouksellinen marksilainen, halusimme niin paljon maahanmuuttoa kuin mahdollista. Ei siksi, että olisimme pitäneet maahanmuuttajista, vaan siksi, että emme pitäneet Britanniasta. Näimme maahanmuuttajat - mistä tahansa maasta - liittolaisina valtiota vastaan, konservatiivista yhteisöä vastaan jollainen maamme oli vielä kuusikymmentäluvulla. Lisäksi halusimme tuntea ylemmyyttä köyhillä alueilla asuvia maanmiehiämme kohtaan kun heidän naapurustonsa muuttuivat "väriseviksi yhteisöiksi". Niitä jotka kehtasivat edes esittää vaatimattomia epäilyksiään, sanoimme rasisteiksi.!

Olenkin nykyään sitä mieltä, että perustelematon viha tuleekin liberaalilta vasemmistolta. Tottakai vieläkin on ihmisiä, joilla on typeriä rotuennakkoluuloja. Mutta suurin osa niistä, jotka ovat huolissaan maahanmuutosta, ovat viattomia moiseen.

Naukuva ja sähisevä suvaitsemattomuus tuleekin hemmotellulta eliitiltä, jotka häpeävät omaa maataan, halveksuvat isänmaallisuutta muissa eivätkä itse tunne sitä. He unelmoivat kammottavasta rajattomasta Utopiasta, jossa rakkaus kotiseutuun on kadonnut, lapsenpiiat halpoja, ja muiden palkat alhaiset.

Mikä harmi, ettei näytä olevan mitään keinoa saada näitä ihmisiä pois vaikutusvaltaisista asemistaan .

How the invasion of immigrants into every corner of England has made a mockery of PM's promise to close the door

Toiselta entiseltä vasemmistoradikaalilta tulossa kirja aiheesta: David Goodhart: The British Dream: Successes and Failures of Post-war Immigration.